sangsara.net

  • Week 46.23

    Week 46.23

    Album of the week: Daft Punk released a “drumless” edition of Random Access Memories and the simple act of removing elements adds an unexpected amount of value. The album strikes a delicate balance between novelty and nostalgia. By removing the drum tracks, it reveals intricate instrumental interplays once masked by robust beats, offering new perspective on familiar melodies. Within minutes, you’ll be surprised at how different this feels. I don’t know how many other albums have been rereleased like this, but it’s a great idea — one made less cynical by the streaming model, as Michael observed in a chat. In the old days, this would just look like trying to sell you a CD you already bought.

    Speaking of cynical purchases avoided, I saw and held the Leica Sofort 2 in person this weekend while attending a talk and exhibition at their annual Celebration of Photography event. The glossy front plastic was not as fingerprint prone as I’d feared, and overall build quality felt a touch better than on the Fujifilm Instax mini Evo: the rocker button on the back panel had more click resistance, the “film advance” lever that prints photos was sturdier and more satisfying to activate, and the flimsy USB port cover on the bottom was slightly firmer and seemed to stay in place. For me, those were the top 3 basic problems that needed to be addressed. The software menus were simply reskinned and not redesigned, as expected. All in all, Leica did the minimum they had to do to make the Fujifilm product a little more premium, but without improvements to image quality, it’s still a very odd product to bear a red dot. I did not feel the urge to replace my mini Evo on the spot.

    Shot on iPhone, edited with looks by ✨PixelGenius

    With Leica’s latest attempt at opening my wallet rejected, my week was free to absorb excesses of a different kind when I met up with Jianjia for a farewell lunch. She decided we would eat Mala at some place called YGF. It turns out that she schedules every meet-up she can there, because she’s addicted to their high sodium spice blend. When I pointed out how salty it was (after she had drunk all her soup, and for the record I couldn’t finish my massive bowl), she was like “huh, maybe that’s why I like it so much. I never had much salt in my food growing up”.

    We are all the products of our childhoods, each messed up in our own special ways, which is something I was discussing with a colleague in a work-related conversation one day when I thought, “ooh, I should make a GPT therapist!” Which I called Doctor Talkabout, and tried to bias it towards exploring barriers to happiness that originated in childhood. On the whole, the unlicensed doctor is now quite good at discussing all manner of problems, and I hope it gives better perspectives than vanilla ChatGPT. And just in case psychology and psychoanalysis are a little too… “real” for you? I also made a GPT therapist based on astrology, inspired by Co—Star. I honestly get a kick out of both, and discussing my problems with them has been more effective at managing my feelings than just going in circles on my own.

    The number of GPTs I’ve made this past week is now in the double digits (including one for work and a private one for editing text), and so I’ve had to make a category page to see them all on this site. Please check them out.

    And yes, some shit is afoot at OpenAI, after CEO Sam Altman was ousted early Saturday morning. Too early to say why, but ChatGPT has noticeably struggled to perform quickly of late, and they’ve both turned off new signups for ChatGPT Plus AND reduced the rate for paying members from 50 to 40 messages every three hours. I have a feeling they might renege on their commitment to open a GPT App Store and share revenue with creators. Time will tell. I wasn’t going to quit my day job for this anyway. And as of Sunday afternoon, he’s supposedly been asked to come back and the board of directors will resign? Pure insanity.

    I watched the first episode of Netflix’s acclaimed Blue Eye Samurai Western anime series, and it felt like something an AI wrote. I don’t get the rave reviews just yet; two people described it to me using Kill Bill as a reference point, and you’ll see why in the super derivative first episode. It even uses the same Tomoyasu Hotei song, Battle Without Honor or Humanity, in a cliche sword-forging and training montage sequence. I mean, Kill Bill itself was a pastiche of samurai movie tropes, but this warms them over without any shame. It also has a dash of Afro Samurai to it, however both of these are examples of how to do homage without feeling like copies. Netflix shows are like cloud kitchen-brand versions of fast food items that were inspired by restaurant dishes.

    Somehow the show has some talent signed up to it: George Takei, Ming Na-Wen, and Kenneth Branagh provide voices. Its writer and co-creator, Michael Green, was involved in Blade Runner 2049 (but also Branagh’s trilogy of Hercule Poirot films which I do not love). But I’ll give it a second chance anyway; there may be other themes at play here beyond the Othered protagonist seeking revenge. But having seen this, I feel like I have a pretty good idea of what AI-generated mass entertainment would look like, and I’m not down for it anymore. I’d like for AGI to come and take away all the other jobs in the world, leaving us humans free to come up with new and more creative ways to show sword fights.

    So imagine my surprise when I started up Pluto (also on Netflix) after two episodes of Blue Eye Samurai, and found it the total opposite in terms of quality. You don’t know where the story is going even if some ideas, like androids that grapple with unexplained dreams from a past life, are familiar and were explored before in other works. It takes its time with characterizations, and aims for a timeless beauty that goes beyond slow-motion action scenes. Polygon has a nice piece about it, but don’t read anything before you’ve seen the first episode, just trust me on that.

  • Co—Sign

    Co—Sign: An interactive astrologer and coach for personalized horoscopes and star-guided advice.

    Features:

    • Calculates your star signs when given birth date, time, and location.
    • A talking horoscope you can engage with — ask questions, articulate fears, deflect responsibility!
    • Get general advice with an astrological twist.
    • Type /help any time for an overview of how it works.

    I was never one for horoscopes until I found the Co—Star app in 2019. It’s not that I suddenly became a believer, but I liked how it gave me random prompts and lenses to consider life’s events through, like spinning a roulette wheel to determine what attitude you should meet the day with. And why not? Letting the stars set you secret objectives can be both a fun challenge and a reminder not to take anything too seriously.

    But the “problem” with horoscopes (excluding those delivered by a fortune teller) that Co—Star doesn’t solve is how their provocations can be quite cryptic and vague. Sometimes you just want to ask a follow-up question!

    Which brings us to the magic statement: “Now with AI”. I made Co—Sign to be a GPT astrologer and life coach you can have a conversation with, and not just ask for a more detailed reading, but talk through problems or situations you’re facing. Instead of generic advice, it’ll give you options that take your astrological traits and temperament into account.

    This was probably the hardest GPT to make yet. I must have spent hours trying to get it to reliably calculate your star signs based on birth date, time, and location. It’ll figure out your natal chart from those inputs, i.e. where all the planets were above you in that moment, and use those to guide its readings. There are astrology calculators online for that, but I wanted Co—Sign to be able to figure it out for itself.

    To begin, you can give it those data points and get an initial interpretation of who you are, or just say hi and let it guide you. From there, ask for a daily outlook, or weekly, or whatever. Ask it for advice, ask it who you’re compatible with, any of the standard things. I recommend keeping one chat open to come back and reengage with it, so you don’t have to calculate your star signs over each time (it can take awhile.)

    Here’s an example of me saying I’m afraid I’d impulse buy a Leica Sofort 2 while attending an exhibition this weekend:

  • Doctor Talkabout

    Doctor Talkabout: A thoughtful “psychologist” exploring happiness and paths to fulfillment.

    I find talking about problems a great way to start feeling better, even better if the listener has some insightful perspectives or solutions, even if it’s just a reframing of what you said. While talking to someone yesterday about actual therapists and how long it takes to bring them up to speed on your situation and get to know you, I wondered if an AI chatbot could accelerate the process and get to insights and solutions faster.

    So, I made Doctor Talkabout. It’s instructed to ask questions, consider the root causes of your problems/feelings, and apply a range of psychological schools of thought as you converse. You can start talking to it about a specific situation you’re in, or just say hi and let it get a sense of how happy or fulfilled you are, and figure out how to make improvements from there.

    I tried it out myself for something that I’ve spoken to therapists about, and was impressed by how it was able to succinctly articulate some helpful concepts, in some ways better than the humans did. I think it comes down to how a person thinking on the fly is never going to deliver their thoughts perfectly each time, but an AI (assuming it has the right idea at all) has a much higher chance of consistently phrasing it well.

    (I must stress that this is an AI chatbot, and you shouldn’t rely on it to solve real problems; see a trained professional if you need help. It’s partly for entertainment, partly a tool for thinking through your thoughts and situation productively when alone. If you have any reason to doubt OpenAI’s commitment to data privacy, then please do not use this to talk about personal matters or your mental health.)

  • DemystiFi GPT

    Explaining money, economics, and the financial world in simple terms. No question is too dumb!

    I must stress that DemystiFi is not a substitute for professional financial advice or your own research. But I started on my personal finance journey quite late by all accounts, only saving and not investing for the first decade of my working life, and missing out on much of the 2010s bull market. It was a different time: no robo-advisors, no apps for buying stocks, and not a whole lot of financial education in the system.

    One of the great things about ChatGPT and generative AI models is that you can learn by having a conversation, with a lot more flexibility than just searching and reading online articles that may or may not answer your questions directly. But without explicit intervention, a lot of the info you receive will still come phrased in the secret language of finance, which isn’t especially useful for people who know so little about money they’ve resorted to asking a chatbot for help!

    So I made DemystiFi to explain things in simple terms, using analogies and plain language. When it uses a financial term, it’ll stop to explain it. If you act like you know a little bit, it’ll gauge your level and ramp up to match you.

    You can ask it about current events (like the announcement of a new inflation figure) and it’ll search the web to find out what happened and explain the implications to you. You can also ask it to help with matters of personal finance, like calculating how much you should save each month in order to retire at 40. It’ll work out some formulas, generate code to calculate it, and give you the results.

    It’s basically the finance friend I wish I had when I was starting out, and still need many times a month these days. I hope it helps you too.

  • Name Guardian GPT

    Okay this one’s a bit childish but useful! Or at least well intentioned. You know how some names just lend themselves to being made fun of, and you’re like… “what were the parents thinking?” Or maybe your name is just fine, but you’re about to marry someone, or your parent is remarrying, and your last name might change into something problematic.

    Name Guardian is here to solve this very niche problem. It will check your name for several “vulnerabilities”, namely does it sound like something rude? Does it have double meanings? Will your initials spell something unintended? Might different forms or contractions of your name have some cultural significance somewhere?

    It even kinda works with Mandarin Chinese names, but it admittedly can’t do anything about dialect names. YMMV but it worked on all the English names I tested it on.

  • FilmNerd GPT

    FilmNerd is your friendly movie buff for deep dives into cinema history, critiques, and all things film! 🎬

    Here’s a fun chatbot for those times you want debate a film but your friends haven’t seen it or have had enough of your bullshit. It’s up for all sorts of questions and hypothetical arguments, and I’m learning a lot just talking to it.

    Example: I asked for a film where a bolt of lightning was at the center of a major plot point and it said Back to the Future (of course!), and then we asked it whether that was a more worthy moment in lightning-centric film discourse than Thor, and it was able to provide compelling arguments both ways.

    Let me know if you enjoy it.

  • Only Murders in the GPT

    After making 🥱SleepyKills🔪 (and 😴SleepyTales) and enjoying their output — like, I was literally sitting there (awake) and listening to their generated stories and having fun trying to steer them — I began to want true crime stories that weren’t meant to be boring. I wondered… what would the fictional podcast from the TV show Only Murders in the Building be like?

    I’ve enjoyed three seasons of it, not just as a show, but as a vibe: a cozy murder mystery set in New York, with almost all the suspense taking place in an apartment building. That same set up is why I enjoy Woody Allen’s Manhattan Murder Mystery so much, and so I wanted to roll all of these up, along with some Agatha Christie, and make a generative podcast that ChatGPT can write and read infinitely for your amusement. It’s like Clue (or Cluedo in some parts of the world). Every story is a little bit the same, but you never know whodunnit.

    So that led to only Murders in the GPT, where The GPT is The Grand Park Towers, an old art deco building bordering Central Park. You can ask it to start a new season, a random episode, or make up an episode based on your direction. Each one should involve a murder in the apartment building, which the narrator is a resident of, and lead to a thrilling investigation.

    If you initiate the conversation with text chat, it’ll be a little wordier and generate a picture to illustrate the episode’s events. If you use Voice Conversations mode, you’ll get the full radio drama experience. It won’t be long before it’s possible to generate real-time music or sound effects to give it a proper podcast feel.

  • Week 45.23: AI on the brain

    Week 45.23: AI on the brain

    This week in artificial intelligence was a big one: Humane unveiled their highly-anticipated wearable, while OpenAI made strides with ChatGPT enhancements.

    The Humane Ai Pin

    A lot has already been said about the letdown that the Humane reveal was, mostly by people confused by the presentation style of the two ex-Apple employees who founded the company.

    If you’ve seen Apple events and Humane’s 10-minute launch video, you’ll note the contrast in delivery and positioning. Apple tries to couch features and designs in real-life use cases, and show authentic enthusiasm for what they do to improve customers’ lives (Steve was unmatched at this). Humane kicked off with all the warmth of a freezer aisle, missing the chance to sell us on why their AI Pin wasn’t just another tech trinket in an already cluttered drawer. They puzzlingly started with how there are three colors available and it’ll come with extra batteries you can swap out, before even saying what the thing does! The rules of storytelling are quite well established, and why they chose to ignore them is a mystery.

    A lot was also said about how two key facts in the video presentation, provided by the AI assistant so central to their product, turned out to be inaccurate. One was about the upcoming solar eclipse in 2024 (and Humane’s logo is an eclipse! How do you get this wrong?), and the other was an estimate of how much protein a handful of nuts has. It’s a stunning lack of attention to detail that this was not fact-checked in a prerecorded video.

    Personally, I have been waiting for the past five years to see what this stealth startup was going to launch, and as the rumors and leaks came out, I was extremely excited to see an alternative vision for how we interact with computers and personal technology. What they showed did not actually stray from what we knew. An intelligent computer that sees what you see, is controlled by natural language, and is able to synthesize the world’s knowledge and project it onto your hand in response to queries is amazing!

    The hardware looks good, channeling the iPhone 5’s design language to my eyes, and I’ll bet they had to pioneer new ideas in miniaturization and engineering to get it down to that size. I expected it to cost as much as an iPhone, but it’s only $699 USD, which feels astoundingly low. That’s not much more than what we used to pay for a large-storage iPod.

    The disappointment is in their strategy. By positioning it as a replacement for your phone rather than an accessory, they’ve reduced the total addressable market to a few curious early adopters and people who want to address having a tech or screen addiction. The kind who intentionally buy featurephones in 2023. I think their anti-screen stance is interesting, but it doesn’t win over the critical mass necessary to scale and challenge norms.

    The Ai Pin comes with its own phone line for messages and calls (for $24/mo), so it’s not going to be convenient to use this alongside your phone, and I would not give up my phone while this is still half-baked — I say this kindly, because even the iPhone launched half-baked in many ways. For many things that we have become accustomed to in life, there is no substitute for a high-definition Retina display capable of showing images, video, and detailed or private information when necessary.

    Do I believe that Apple can one day get Siri to the level of competence that OpenAI has? I have to hope, because the Apple Watch is probably a better place for an AI assistant to live than in a magnetically attached square on my T-shirt. In any case, Humane seem to have taken a leaf out of their old employers’ playbook, and will be releasing this first version only in the US, and so whether or not I would buy one is a moot point.

    OpenAI and GPTs

    Speaking of OpenAI, it would seem that they’re still the team to beat when it comes to foundation models. The playing field is full of open-source alternatives now, including Lee Kai-Fu’s 01.ai and their Yi-series models, but as a do-it-all company offering dependable access to dependable AI, OpenAI seems unassailable.

    They announced enhancements to their models, increasing context windows and speeds while halving prices for developers, and launched a new consumer-friendly product: customized instances of ChatGPT that work like dedicated apps, which they call “GPTs”. In effect, these are a version of Custom Instructions which were introduced earlier this year as a way to tell ChatGPT how to behave across all chats. But sometimes you’re a researcher at work and sometimes you want to have some dumb fun, thus I’m not sure they caught on.

    So now GPTs let you specify (pre-prompt?) different contexts and neatly turn them into separate tools for different purposes. Importantly, you can now also upload knowledge in the form of files and documents for the agents’ reference in generating replies. This makes them more powerful and app-like, and normal people like me with no coding ability can create them by telling a bot what they want (in natural language, of course), or writing prompts directly. I recommend the latter, because chatting with the “Create” front-end tends to oversimplify your instructions over time and you risk losing a lot of detail about how you want it to work and interact with users.

    So what does the launch of these GPTs mean? Well, for many of the developers who were riding the OpenAI wave and only used their APIs to build simplistic wrapper apps, it’s a sudden shift in the tide and they’re now forced to build things that aren’t reducible to mere prompts.

    What we’ll soon see is a GPT gold rush. Brace yourself for a stampede of AI prospectors, each hunting for their piece of OpenAI’s bonanza — the company will be curating and offering GPTs in a “Store” and sharing revenue with creators. That’s a different model than their APIs where developers pay OpenAI for compute and charge users in turn. Here, users all pay OpenAI a flat fee for ChatGPT Plus and can use community-made GPTs all they want (within the rate limits).

    Hear everyone talking about a viral GPT that makes it so easy to do X? When you want to try it out, you’ll see a call-to-action to sign up for ChatGPT Plus. This signals to me that launching GPTs is a strategy to drive paid account conversion, which begins the lock-in that OpenAI needs in order to make ChatGPT the new OS for services, not unlike how WeChat is the base layer that runs China, regardless of whether you use iOS or Android. Eventually you won’t even need to know about or choose the GPTs you use; the master ChatGPT system will call them as necessary. We may not be headed for a screen-less future, but we’ll probably see an app-less one.

    My GPT projects

    Of course I’m playing with this and making some of my own! Did you think I wouldn’t, given the ability to create AI things without coding?

    I’ve got a list of ideas to work on, and so far I’ve acted on three of them, which are explained on this blog in separate posts.

    ✨ PixelGenius was my first, and contains the most complex prompt I’ve ever written. It started out as a tool to generate photo editing presets/filters that you can use on your own in any sufficiently advanced photo editing app with curves, H/S/L controls, and color grading options. You can just say “I want to achieve the look of Fujifilm Astia slide film” and it’ll tell you how to do that. But now it does more than just make presets, which you can find out about here. More details and examples in the blog post here.

    SleepyTales
    SleepyKills

    😴 SleepyTales was the second, and I’m still amazed at how good it is. It’s designed for Voice Conversations mode (currently only in the mobile app), so you can get a realistic human voice reading you original (and also interactive, if desired) bedtime stories. These are never-ending, long, and absolutely boring tales with no real point, in drama-free settings, told in a cozy and peaceful manner. It’s the storytelling equivalent of watching paint dry, yet oddly mesmerizing. More on this and the next one here.

    🥱 SleepyKills 🔪 was born from a hilarious misread — I told Cien about it and ‘mundane’ became ‘murder’. So if your bedtime stories of choice are usually true crime podcasts, then you’re in luck. This GPT agent will create an infinite number of dreary murder stories, but stripped of all suspense, mystery, and excitement. They’re about as exciting as real police work, not the flashy TV investigating sort. Again, I still can’t believe how cool it is to hear these being written and read in real time.

    People have said the Voice Conversations feature is a game-changer for ChatGPT, but I didn’t really get it at first when using it for general queries. IMO, the killer app for it is storytelling. I’ve been using the voice called Sky for both the above bedtime stories apps, and it works well.

    Films

    • I watched David Fincher’s new film The Killer in bed on my iPad, just like he would want me to. Even then, it was spectacular, a cinematic victory lap for both him and Michael Fassbender. It plays with genre conventions, expectations, and riffs off his own body of work. There are some great moments and a fantastic performance by Tilda Swinton. 4.5 stars.
    • Speaking of performances by English actors, I also watched Guy Ritchie’s Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre, which is both a terrible name and attempt at creating a new globetrotting spy/special ops team franchise. But, he has a certain touch even when making shit, and the film is a hell of a lot of fun, bringing out the best in Jason Statham (who tried to hold up The Expendables 4 and failed), as well as a villainous turn from Hugh Grant that — I shit you not — is easily a Top 10 career highlight for him. Jason Statham in the right hands is a very different animal than when he’s doing B material; I don’t know how to explain it. I actually gave it 4 stars on Letterboxd and won’t take it back.

    Album of the week

    REM’s Up received a 25th Anniversary Edition, with some tracks seemingly remastered and a whole second “disc” of an unreleased live performance they recorded on the set of the TV show Party of Five?! Sadly it is not a track-for-track live performance of the album, which would have been great. There’s no Dolby Atmos here either, so I’m just taking this as an opportunity to revisit this album.

    I can still feel the gut punch from the day Bill Berry bowed out, post-aneurysm. I was afraid they might break up, and REM was absolutely my favorite band back then (maybe still), so when Up came out, I was hopeful for a new and long-lived chapter to begin. And yeah, it was a weird album, playing with new sounds and using drum machines — not unlike The Smashing Pumpkins’ Adore album after Jimmy Chamberlin left. But many songs were great, some even recognizably REM. The band kept going for a few more albums, each a new spin on an evolving sound. And in true style, they dropped the mic at just the right moment.