Wow, my bad. In the last post I said that it was highly unlikely the Olympus Stylus 1000 could meet its claims of fixing motion blur after the fact, with a software process. It seems such things might be possible (although not with the Olympus). This program, Focus Magic, claims to be able to undo motion blurring and also offers an alternative method of sharpening photos. I’m about to try it out.

UPDATE: It sucks, and is very slow with its unspectacular processing. There is, of course, the chance that I wasn’t meticulous enough with my noodling on a sample photo. But anyone who doubts my Final Word of Damnation is free to knock themselves out.

This camera is a bit of a disappointment. I’ve owned 2 other Olympus point-and-shoots (film), and they were fantastic. Olympus pretty much led the way for compact camera technology and adoption, and it’s a bit sad really to see them in the state they are today, playing the megapixel game with loser companies like CASIO and producing sub-par products.

The Stylus 1000 is their top-of-the-line digital P&S. 10 megapixel images, 3x digital zoom, and ISO sensitivity up to 6400 (ISO1600 for full-sized 10mp shots). The Stylus 750 might actually be a better buy, as it features mechanical Image Stabilization. The 1000 model pictured above relies solely on high ISO sensitivity to eliminate blur.

Does it work? Sure, if you like blur-free photos splotched with green and red color noise. Even worse, photos taken at ISO3200-6400 are limited to 2000 pixels across. That’s significantly less resolution, and suddenly you’re doing digital photography from the nineties. Dude.

The new Styluses/Stylii also feature in-camera photo editing, called Perfect Fix. The audacity! If I weren’t so good at deduction, I’d look at their shitty results and conclude the Olympus engineers were all heroin addicts. Perfect Fix is made up of 3 functions that can be applied to your photos. Sometimes only one or two are available. No reasons are given, other than the fact that never knowing when you won’t be allowed to Perfect Fix your photos keeps you trying harder.

1) D.I.S. – Digital Image Stabilization. This claims to reverse the blurring caused by camera shake at the moment of capture. It may also alleviate subject blurring. Wow. This is the holy grail of photo editing, folks. Time for some bad news: if details aren’t present because of blurring, there’s no way in hell software can reconstruct what should be there. And as expected, when you run this function, all the camera does is apply a sharpening effect. Wowwee. It’s like doing it yourself in Picasa/iPhoto/Photoshop, only worse. It increases noticeable noise and oversaturates colors.

2) Lighting Fix. This brightens dark areas of photographs. Sort of compresses shadow/highlight dynamic range, but not very well. Again, increases noise and can’t beat a simple levels adjustment in Photoshop.

3) Red-eye Fix. I haven’t been able to test this because the flash doesn’t seem to be strong enough to cause red-eye.

So the final word for tonight is that this camera is just barely a decent purchase, and only if you’re planning to take throwaway candid shots in good light. The sensor doesn’t seem up to the task of capturing 10mp pictures, and shots are plagued by noise and a lack of sharp detail. Auto White Balance performance is also unremarkable and cannot handle tungsten. You have to manually select a preset. It scores marks for being splash/rain-proof and having an attractive metal body. I would take it around with me for fun, but not for work, or on holiday.

In my opinion, there is still not a digital compact camera that can rival the Fujifilm ‘F’ series. I use an F30 and the results it delivers under all lighting conditions are solid, and most importantly, natural. It combines high ISO sensitivity with very good noise-suppression routines (good enough to rival Noise Ninja) that run automatically after each capture, without the added hassle and time wasting of Perfect Fix. Canon’s IXUS range comes in a close second for having mechanical Image Stabilization, which the Fuji cameras lack but rarely need.

model-ass and photographers
Originally uploaded by robtanphotos.

The blond guy in the white briefs, I mean. One day I want to be just like him.

Edit: I’ve been advised to clarify that I mean he’s cool because of the way he’s dressed. Not because he’s at some adult convention. Anybody can go to one; not everyone can go looking so superfly.

This awesomely white Optimus Prime Transformers toy is also a fully-licensed iPod accessory.

Made by Takara Tomy (when did the Takara creep in? Is that the Japanese office’s full name?), this Optimus is an iPod speaker dock presumably made with double-shot plastic and chrome on its underbelly.

Out in June, pre-orders are going for USD$145 at the Big Bag Toy Store. I’ll take one of those, with a Kubrick dock to keep it company. [via cNet Crave]

If anyone has an M3 and cares.

Reversed Deck:

Download

Royal Flush:

Download

Pandamonium (threadless.com tee):

Download

I bought an M3 DS Simply flashcard from Divineo.cn (good experience, received in 3 days via EMS shipping) and have started making skins for it. Loads of fun. A word of advice to anyone looking to buy one, don’t use Sandisk MicroSD (TransFlash) cards. You’re likely to run into compatibility problems on certain ROMs/apps, and the transfer speed is supposed to be sub-par. Word on the street is that Kingston cards are fine, but only the ones manufactured in Japan. So check the back of the package before buying. The other countries producing Kingston are Taiwan and China.

The M3 and R4 cards are essentially the same products, but release their firmware updates separately. The R4 is cheaper, but its future is in slightly more doubt with M3 being a rather established name in the business.

Here are two skins I have so far:

Applesque:

Download The Hoff

And The Hoff:

Yes, his nipples are the buttons.

Download

A couple of weeks ago, I received a new audio enhancement product from Creative Technologies called the xMod. The ‘X’ in its name comes from “X-Fi”, or eXtreme Fidelity, Creative’s version of ‘high fidelity’ (which is a term that obviously doesn’t sound radical or daring enough). X-Fi is a digital sound processing technology that first appeared in their PC prosumer-level soundcards over a year ago. The xMod signifies the technology’s first attempt at breaking into the living room/consumer electronics space. Well, sorta.

You see, the xMod CAN connect to your hi-fi and home entertainment systems, and it can connect to your TV-based game consoles, MP3 players, and so on, but it doesn’t make it easy. It is first and foremost an external USB sound device for your computer (PCs and Macs both, a first for Creative). In order to use it as a passthrough device for any other line-in/line-out supporting audio device, you will need to purchase a power adapter and an audio cable that do not come in the package. At a list price of SGD$138, that feels like a bit of a raw deal. Especially when the box contains a pair of Creative earbuds that most people will ignore.

So, on to the sound. If you haven’t already noticed, I unboxed and started on it with a slightly negative bias, so it was an uphill battle for the xMod from the start. The packaging was a nice surprise though – marked by a clean black and white box design that shows a willingness somewhere in the corporate machine to discard their awful trademark colors of blue and yellow. My review unit came with marketing materials that make a whole lot of outlandish claims. My advice to you will be to avoid all brochures and posters with “facts” about X-Fi and the xMod. Just hear one for yourself, and pay no attention to bar graphs and probably-paid-for-quotes to the effect that X-Fi is the second coming of Jesus. Who else but Jesus could accomplish the water-to-wine miracle of restoring damaged MP3 audio to an experiential level that SURPASSES the original studio recording from which the CDs and MP3 files were made?

Creative’s attempts to shoot themselves in the foot aside, the product is impressive. It combines relative consumer-friendly ease of use with a solid, tangible audio benefit.

The X-Fi effect comes in two parts. First, a feature they call the 24-bit Crystalizer. When turned on, this enhances the high and low-end audio peaks and troughs while leaving the midrange untouched. This means that most instruments are made more vivid, intense, and bassy, while human vocals remain the same. 24-bit? Okay, the original audio is upsampled and all processing is done at the 24-bit level. That’s all. The brochure will try to convince you that it finally equals a 24-bit studio recording, but you can lock it in the basement and sell the house.

The second part is called CMSS-3D. Part of the fun of owning an xMod is making up meanings for this mysterious acronym. Is it the Creative Master Sound System? A warning that the xMod Cannot Make Surround Sound? Or perhaps an exercise in circular redundancy in product naming and brand-building: Creative Makes Singaporean Stuff. Whatever. It works like most stereo widening effects such as SRS’s WOW, Q-Sound, and the Spatializer. Except it comes in two forms, one for 2-speaker setups, and one for headphones. Both are equally impressive, and because the xMod is an external module (aha! it all makes sense now!), your CPU cycles shouldn’t be used up on audio processing.

It is, to my knowledge, the only external spatialization product on the market today for enhancing your computer’s audio. I’ve used many software plugins that purport to do the same, from OSS-3D on the Mac platform to DFX for Winamp on a Windows PC. None of them provide results on par with the Creative xMod. Those competitors require set up, tweaking, and often produce clipping and distortion when the wrong settings are used. The xMod puts no such complications in your way. The effect is customizable, but it’s as easy as turning a knob and deciding how far apart you want your virtual speakers. It handles all the audio processing very well, never distorting music once in all the time I’ve been using it (at the default setting).

Most of my testing has been done on a 2.1 JBL computer speaker system connected to my iBook. Regular recorded music sounds more robust (and that’s not just from the volume boost that the CMSS-3D seems to create) and the stereo separation makes the tiny speakers seem larger than they are. Try this test: stare at your speakers and visualize the sound coming from there. Your brain should be able to make the link. Now turn the xMod on. You will quite literally be able to see the sound start to come from behind and around the speakers, which will no longer seem to have anything to do with the sound. Yes? Or maybe I’m just a synesthete.

While everything from contemporary (stereo recorded) jazz to pop music sounds good, it is in the playback of live recordings that the xMod shines. The ambience creation and active treble/bass enhancement characteristics of X-Fi do a lot to make you feel like you’re in the crowd. Audience chatter is reproduced around you, while the music remains in front. Instruments play from all over the stage, distinct and separate. Any attempt to turn the xMod off halfway just reaffirms how pleasant the experience is, and how you probably can’t live without one from now on.

Sure, you might take the hundred or so dollars and put them towards a better speaker fund, or you might buy a software plugin, or spend time tuning EQ presets to each song, but the xMod’s set-and-forget style of audio enhancement is very attractive; makes it ideal for the largest number of non-audiophile consumers, and actually possesses the ability to coax already good speakers into reproducing a better ‘live’ sound experience. I, for one, am keeping mine.

A couple of weeks back, I started ordering double-double-cheeseburgers at Burger King. I called it the Quad Cheeseburger, with its variants the Mushroom Swiss Quattro and Turkey Bacon Bezerker. It’s not as expensive as you might think. Add $1 for every patty. Every single time, the kitchen assistant would come out from the back and confirm that I wanted four patties in a single burger. I’d say yes, and they’d look at me like a criminal or a very fat man (is there any difference?) I’m training up for a quad Whopper.

This is what it typically looks like, without doubling the cheese:

This is what it looks like when you’re halfway through:

It’s beef quad-tastic.

I just thought I’d google “quad cheeseburger” and guess what? Well, this should surprise no one, but I’m way ahead of the curve again and Burger King USA put out a similar PERMANENT menu item called the Quad Stacker back in July. It has 4 beef patties, 4 slices of cheese, and 8 strips of bacon. All at a low and very reasonable 1000 calories!! Yeah you think that’s a lot, but a plate of Char Kway Tiao will do you for 800 or so. And not even taste as good!

Here’s some info on the Quad Stacker. And here.

This is what they want you to think it looks like:

And this is what it looks like:

Hey who says someone in the bidness can’t give you some truth now and then?